Home | Publications | Therapeutic place holder
place holder place holder

Therapeutic


Therapeutic Proteins


Publication Date   February 2005
Publisher   Visiongain
Product Type   Report
Pages   234
ISBN Number   not applicable
Product Code   VIS019
Ask a question about this product?

Price £1,999.00

approximately: $3,530 | €2,535

Summary


Please Note: Reports are sold based on the user licenses indicated. The reports will be accessible in Flash format via an online reading room on the publisher website, allowing viewing and printing capabilities only. Within one to two business days after placing the order,the client will receive an email with information on accessing their purchase.

Proteins that are engineered in the laboratory for pharmaceutical use are known as therapeutic proteins. The majority of biopharmaceuticals marketed to date are recombinant therapeutic protein drugs. But how much potential does this market have? Will the shortfall in manufacturing capacity dampen its growth? Will the high cost of these drugs ever be reduced? And how imminent is the threat from biogeneric competition? These and many other questions will be answered in this comprehensive 230-page report on the market for therapeutic proteins.

In 2003, the market for therapeutic proteins grew by almost 19% to $37 billion, and is predicted to achieve sales of over $90 billion by 2010. Future growth however depends largely on the industry overcoming a number of hurdles, including drug delivery challenges and cost issues.

Today therapeutic proteins are used to relieve patients suffering from many conditions, including:

  • Various cancers (Monoclonal antibodies, Interferons)
  • Heart attacks, strokes, cystic fibrosis, Gaucher's disease (Enzymes, Blood factors)
  • Diabetes (Insulin)
  • Anaemia (Erythropoietin)
  • Haemophilia (Blood clotting factors)

The leading therapeutic protein treatments in 2003 were:

  • Johnson & Johnson's anaemia treatment Procrit
  • Amgen's anaemia treatment Epogen
  • Schering-Plough's hepatitis treatments Intron A and Peg-Intron

The leading classes of therapeutic proteins in 2003 were:

  • Erythropoietins
  • Monoclonal antibodies
  • Interferons

While the top companies on the market were:

  • Amgen
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Roche

WHY YOU MUST BUY THIS REPORT

With over 80 graphs and figures, plus almost 60 tables, this report represents a key tool for companies wishing to enter into or expand in the therapeutic protein market. The reader will be left with a clear idea of:

  • The challenges faced by the therapeutic protein market, and how these are being overcome
  • The current and future market leaders in terms of brand, class, category and company, covering the period 2003-2010
  • Therapeutic targets currently being developed in the field and who is responsible for this development
  • The competition that companies will face during the forecast period from current and pipeline products

COMPANIES MENTIONED IN THIS REPORT

  • 3M Drug Delivery Systems
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Abgenix
  • Alfacell
  • Alkermes Inc.
  • Altus
  • Amarillo Biosciences
  • Amgen
  • Antisoma
  • Aphton
  • Aventis
  • Bayer
  • Biocon
  • Biogen
  • Biogen Idec.
  • Biomarin
  • Biomura
  • Bioscience Contract Prodcution
  • Biovex
  • Boehringer-Ingelheim
  • Borealis Ventures
  • Boston Millenia Partners
  • Cangene
  • Celltech
  • Centacor
  • Chiron
  • Chugai Phamra
  • Coremed
  • Corixa
  • Covance
  • CSL
  • Dendreon
  • DSM
  • Eli Lilly
  • Emisphere Technologies
  • Epimmune
  • Fletcher Spaght Ventures
  • Genencor
  • Genentech
  • Generex Biotech
  • Genzyme
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • GlycoFi
  • Goodwin Biotechnology
  • Human Genome Sciences
  • Idec
  • ILEX Oncology
  • ImClone
  • Immunex
  • ImmunoGen
  • Innogenetics
  • Intarcia
  • Intercell
  • Interferon Sciences
  • InterMune
  • Janssen-Cilag
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • Kirin Brewery Company
  • Lonza
  • Lundbeck
  • Mannkind Corporation
  • Maxygen
  • MedImmune
  • Merck
  • Nastech Pharmaceutical
  • NCI
  • Nobex
  • Novartis
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Ortho Biologics LCC
  • Ortho Biotech
  • Par Pharmaceutical
  • PDL
  • Peninsula Equity Partners
  • Pfizer
  • Pharmacia Corporation
  • Polaris Ventures
  • Polymasc Pharmaceuticals
  • Roche
  • Sandoz
  • Sankyo
  • Sanofi-Aventis
  • Schering-AG
  • Schering-Plough
  • Schroder Ventures Life Sci.
  • Serono
  • Shire Pharmaceuticals
  • SouthWest Oncology Group
  • Syntonix Pharmaceuticals
  • Takeda
  • Tanabe Seiyaku
  • Tanox
  • Teva Neuroscience
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  • Therion Biologics
  • Three Rivers Pharmaceuticals
  • Titan Pharma
  • Transkaryotic Therapies
  • Valentis
  • Village Ventures
  • West Drug Delivery
  • Wyeth
  • Yamanouchi
  • YM Biosciences

Content


  • 1. Executive Summary
  • 2. Introduction
    • 2.1 What are Therapeutic Proteins?
    • 2.2 What is the Market for Therapeutic Proteins and how will it Alter in the Future?
    • 2.3 Aims, Scope and Format of this Report
  • 3. Unmet Needs and Key Issues Affecting the Therapeutic Protein Market
    • 3.1 Drug Delivery Challenges
      • 3.1.1 The Majority of Therapeutic Proteins Can Only be Administered Parenterally
      • 3.1.2 Pulmonary Delivery: A Viable Alternative to Injections
        • 3.1.2.1 What is the Main Challenge in Pulmonary Delivery?
        • 3.1.2.2 Are There any Problems with Bioavailability?
        • 3.1.2.3 Does the Formulation of the Protein Affect its Delivery?
        • 3.1.2.4 Syntonix are Developing Pulmonary Technology that does not Require Deep-Lung Delivery
        • 3.1.2.5 Does Pulmonary Drug Delivery Have a Future?
      • 3.1.3 Nasal Delivery Enables Pulsed-Release Dosing, Which Aids Protein Effectiveness
        • 3.1.3.1 What Types of Nasal Drug Delivery Systems are in Development?
        • 3.1.3.2 The ChiSys(tm) Nasal Delivery System
      • 3.1.4 Oral Delivery: In Development by Altus
      • 3.1.5 Microneedles for Transdermal Delivery of Vaccines
      • 3.1.6 Are There Methods for Increasing the Half-Life of a Protein?
        • 3.1.6.1 Polymeric Delivery Ensures Proteins Remain Active for Longer
        • 3.1.6.2 Polymer-Protein Conjugation
      • 3.1.7 Can Advances in Protein Drug Delivery Result in Drugs for Treatment of CNS Disorders?
    • 3.2 Manufacturing Capacity Shortfall
      • 3.2.1 Why is There a Shortfall in Manufacturing Capacity for Therapeutic Proteins?
        • 3.2.1.1 Make Vs. Buy in the 1980s
        • 3.2.1.2 CMO Manufacturing Capacity was Adequate for the Supply of Clinical Materials Only
        • 3.2.1.3 Late-Stage Products have absorbed CMO Clinical Manufacturing Capacity
      • 3.2.2 How is the Manufacturing Capacity Shortfall Being Overcome?
      • 3.2.3 Does The Future for Therapeutic Protein Manufacturing Lie with Transgenics?
    • 3.3 The Cost of Therapeutic Proteins
      • 3.3.1 The Top Ten Therapeutic Proteins Each Cost at Least $10K Per Patient Per Year
      • 3.3.2 What Do the Most Costly of the Top Ten Therapeutic Proteins Have in Common?
      • 3.3.3 Yeast-Based Systems May Bring Down the Cost of Therapeutic Proteins in the Future
    • 3.4 Biogeneric Competition: A Real or Limited Threat?
      • 3.4.1 How are Approval Pathways Limiting the Development of Biogenerics?
      • 3.4.2 Will the Benefits of Biogenerics be as Great as Anticipated?
      • 3.4.3 What About the High Cost of Market Entry?
      • 3.4.4 What About Manufacturing Capacity Problems?
      • 3.4.5 What Class of Therapeutic Protein is the Chief Target for Biogenerics?
      • 3.4.6 How Imminent is the Threat from Biogeneric Competition?
    • 3.5 Drivers and Restraints of the Therapeutic Protein Market
  • 4. An Overview of the Global Therapeutic Proteins Market, 2003-2004
    • 4.1 The Therapeutic Proteins Market Increased by Almost 20% in 2003, Gaining Six New Products and Four Blockbusters
    • 4.2 Four of the Six Newcomers are Monoclonal Antibodies
      • 4.2.1 Pegasys is the Best-Selling Newcomer to the Therapeutic Protein, and Global Pharma Market
      • 4.2.2 Humira is the Best-Selling New Monoclonal Antibody on the Market
      • 4.2.3 Fabrazyme Made $81m in Eight Months
      • 4.2.4 Amevive Was Approved for Sale in Canada in 2004
      • 4.2.5 Herceptin is Now Enjoying Success in Japan
      • 4.2.6 Xolair: Sales of $170m Expected in its First Full Year on the Market
      • 4.2.7 Newcomers will be Market Drivers in 2004 with a Triple-Digit Increase in Sales
    • 4.3 The Therapeutic Protein Market Contained 11 Blockbuster Products
    • 4.4 The Top Three Therapeutic Proteins Sold Over $8bn in 2003 and Held a 23% Market Share
      • 4.4.1 Procrit/Eprex - The Number One Therapeutic Protein Struggles at the Top
      • 4.4.2 Epogen is the Second Best-Selling Therapeutic Protein
      • 4.4.3 Intron A and Peg-Intron
    • 4.5 Aranesp, Neulasta and Enbrel are the Most Successful Therapeutic Proteins in Terms of Growth
      • 4.5.1 Aranesp is the Fastest-Growing Therapeutic Protein
        • 4.5.1.1 Head-to-Head Studies Show Aranesp Dosed Every Two Weeks is Comparable to Epoetin Alfa Dosed Once a Week
        • 4.5.1.2 Sales of Aranesp Will Top $2.3 Billion in 2004
      • 4.5.2 Neulasta - Amgen's Neutropenia Superstar
      • 4.5.3 Enbrel Completes a Hat Trick for Amgen as the Third Fastest-Growing Therapeutic Protein on the Market
        • 4.5.3.1 Enbrel Has a Number of New Indications
        • 4.5.3.2 Side-Effects of Competitor Medications May Prove Advantageous for Enbrel
    • 4.6 The Intron A Family and Genotropin were the Least Successful Therapeutic Proteins in Terms of Growth
    • 4.7 The Leading Classes of Therapeutic Proteins are Erythropoietins, Monoclonal Antibodies and Interferons
      • 4.7.1 Erythropoietins Lead with a More-Than Quarter Share of the Market
      • 4.7.2 The Monoclonal Antibody Class Contained More Products than Any Other Class of Therapeutic Protein
      • 4.7.3 Interferons Sold $5.5 Billion in 2003 but are Set for Huge Losses in 2004
    • 4.8 Blood Modifiers, Multiple Sclerosis and Anti-Arthritic Drugs are the Leading Therapeutic Categories for Therapeutic Proteins
      • 4.8.1 Blood Modifiers Dominate Due to Erythropoietins
      • 4.8.2 Multiple Sclerosis Drugs Hold on to Their Market Share
      • 4.8.3 Anti-Arthritic Drugs are Third Best-Selling and Fastest-Growing Therapeutic Category
    • 4.9 Only Two Therapeutic Categories Saw Negative Growth in 2003
    • 4.10 Amgen Dominates the Market with Almost $8 Billion in Sales
    • 4.10.1 Who are Amgen?
    • 4.10.2 All of Amgen's Therapeutic Proteins are Blockbusters.... And Other Facts
    • 4.11 Johnson and Johnson: The Second Most-Successful Company in the Market is Losing its Grip
    • 4.12 Roche are the Number Three in the Market with Drugs For a Variety of Indications
    • 4.13 Wyeth: One of the Fastest-Growing Companies with all Products Experiencing Double-Digit Growth
  • 5. The Market for Erythropoietins
    • 5.1 What is Erythropoietin?
    • 5.2 What are the Different Types of Erythropoietins on the Market and What are they Worth?
    • 5.3 Procrit/Eprex' Sales will Recover
    • 5.4 Epogen - The Class Progenitor
    • 5.5 Aranesp - The New EPO on the Block
    • 5.6 NeoRecormon Will Be Unaffected by Patent Expiry
    • 5.7 Epogin and Espo
    • 5.8 The Erythropoietin Pipeline
      • 5.8.1 Cera will Replace NeoRecormon as Roche's Leading Erythropoietin
      • 5.8.2 Dynepo is Ready to be Marketed in the EU but Still Awaits FDA Approval
      • 5.8.3 Roche Have Another Erythropoietin in Early-Stage Development
    • 5.9 The Erythropoietin Class will be Worth Over $17bn by 2010
  • 6. The Market for Monoclonal Antibodies
    • 6.1 What are Monoclonal Antibodies?
    • 6.2 What are the Problems Associated with Monoclonal Antibodies as Therapeutic Agents?
    • 6.3 What Monoclonal Antibodies are on the Market and what are they Worth?
    • 6.4 What Types of Monoclonal Antibodies are There and What Conditions do They Treat?
      • 6.4.1 Murine
      • 6.4.2 Chimeric Antibodies
      • 6.4.3 Humanised Antibodies (CDR-Grafted)
      • 6.4.4 Human Antibodies
      • 6.4.5 Receptor-Antibody Fusion Protein
      • 6.4.6 Chimeric Monoclonal Antibodies Dominate the Market
      • 6.4.7 Monoclonal Antibodies Have Eight Main Indications, of Which Arthritis is the Best Selling
      • 6.4.8 Why do Arthritis Medications Dominate?
      • 6.4.9 Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Drugs Come a Close Second to Arthritis Medications
      • 6.4.10 What is Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and how Prevalent is it?
    • 6.5 Remicade is the Best-Selling Monoclonal Antibody
      • 6.5.1 How Safe is Remicade?
      • 6.5.2 Remicade Lacks Patent Protection and Market Exclusivity but Continues to Grow
    • 6.6 Genentech's Rituxan Leads the Way in Treatment for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
    • 6.7 Herceptin is the Third Best Selling MAb on the Market
    • 6.8 What are the Most Promising New MAbs on the Market?
      • 6.8.1 Abbott's Humira is the First in its Class
      • 6.8.2 Bexxar and Zevalin Represent Another New Class of MAbs
      • 6.8.3 Avastin: An Important New Treatment for the Third Most Fatal Cancer in the US
      • 6.8.4 Erbitux will Enjoy Success, but not on the Same Scale as Avastin
    • 6.9 The Monoclonal Antibody Late-Stage Pipeline
      • 6.9.1 Tysabri Could Take a 50% Share of the Multiple Sclerosis Market
    • 6.10 The Monoclonal Antibody Early-Stage Pipeline
    • 6.11 Monoclonal Antibodies Will be Worth Over $26 Billion by 2010
  • 7. The Market for Interferons
    • 7.1 What is an Interferon?
    • 7.2 What Diseases do Interferons Treat?
    • 7.3 What Interferons are on the Top 400 Market and How Much are they Worth?
    • 7.4 The Intron A Family versus Pegasys: Pegasys Looks Set for Victory
      • 7.4.1 What is Pegasys and what makes it Different from Other Hepatitis Treatments?
      • 7.4.2 Pegasys Can Now Also Treat Hepatitis B
      • 7.4.3 Pegasys will be the Market Leader by 2005
    • 7.5 Who Will Win the War to Become the Top-Selling Multiple Sclerosis Treatment?
      • 7.5.1 Market-Leading Avonex will soon Succumb to Competitive Pressure from Rebif
      • 7.5.2 Betaseron will Remain a Best-Seller, But Growth will be Relatively Flat
    • 7.6 The Interferon Pipeline
      • 7.6.1 Nastech Pharma Have a Nasal Interferon Available for Licensing
    • 7.1 Box Who are Nastech Pharmaceuticals?
      • 7.6.2 Amarillo Biosciences are Developing an Oral Interferon for Hepatitis C
    • 7.2 Box Who are Amarillo Biosciences?
    • 7.7 The Market for Interferons will be Worth over $12bn in 2010
  • 8. The Market for Insulin
    • 8.1 What is Insulin?
    • 8.2 How Prevalent is Diabetes?
    • 8.3 What Insulin Treatments are on the Market and What are They Worth?
    • 8.4 Humulin Will Lose its Spot at the Top to Lilly's New and Improved Humalog
    • 8.5 Sanofi-Aventis' Lantus is Rising Fast to the Top of the Insulin Market
    • 8.6 Recently-Approved Insulins: How Will They Perform?
      • 8.6.1 Novo Nordisk Claims New Product Superior to Lantus
      • 8.6.2 Apidra May Benefit from Lantus' Success
    • 8.7 The Insulin Pipeline
      • 8.7.1 Exubera will be the First Non-Injected Insulin on the Market
      • 8.7.2 Novo Nordisk May Launch Their Inhaled Insulin by 2009
      • 8.7.3 Generex Biotech Lead the Race to Market the First Oral Insulin
      • 8.7.4 Will HIM2 be the First Insulin Pill on the Market?
    • 8.8 Lantus will be the Top Selling Insulin in 2010, when the Market will be Worth $9.5bn
  • 9. The Market for Colony Stimulating Factor
    • 9.1 What is Colony Stimulating Factor and What Diseases does it Treat?
    • 9.2 What CSFs are Available and What is the Market Worth?
    • 9.3 Neupogen: Amgen's Orphan Drug for the Treatment of Neutropenia
    • 9.4 Amgen Has Released a New-Improved Form of Neupogen: Neulasta
    • 9.5 Little Competition for Amgen in the Neutropenia Market
    • 9.6 The CSF Pipeline
    • 9.7 The CSF Market will be Worth Over $4.8bn by 2010
  • 10. The Market for Other Classes of Therapeutic Protein
    • 10.1 The Market for Blood Factors
      • 10.1.1 What are Blood Factors and which ones Feature on the Therapeutic Protein Market?
      • 10.1.2 What is Haemophilia and how Prevalent is it?
      • 10.1.3 NovoSeven is the Top Selling Haemophilia Drug, but not for Long
      • 10.1.4 Kogenate: The Runner-Up to NovoSeven
      • 10.1.5 Benefix: Wyeth's Breakthrough Haemophilia B Treatment
      • 10.1.6 ReFacto: Wyeth's Breakthrough Haemophilia A Treatment
      • 10.1.7 The Blood Factor Pipeline
      • 10.1.8 By 2010 Blood Factors will be Worth in Excess of $2.5bn
    • 10.2 The Market for Therapeutic Vaccines
      • 10.2.1 The Market for Therapeutic Vaccines is Sparse
      • 10.2.2 Why is the Market Experiencing Flat Growth?
      • 10.2.3 The Therapeutic Vaccine Pipeline
      • 10.2.4 Sales of Therapeutic Vaccines will Grow in Double-Digits in the Forecast Period
    • 10.3 The Market for Growth Hormones
      • 10.3.1 What is Growth Hormone and What is the Market Worth?
      • 10.3.2 What is Growth Failure and What Causes it?
      • 10.3.3 Genotropin: Pfizer Under Investigation
      • 10.3.4 Humatrope: Eli Lilly's Growth Hormone
      • 10.3.5 Nutropin, Nutropin Depot and Protropin
      • 10.3.6 The Hormone Market will Experience Flat Growth Between 2004 and 2010
    • 10.4 The Market for Enzymes
      • 10.4.1 What are Enzymes, what Diseases do they Treat and what is the Market Worth?
      • 10.4.2 What is in the Enzyme Pipeline?
      • 10.4.3 All Enzymes on the Market will Enjoy Positive Growth Between 2004 and 2010
    • 10.5 The Market for Enbrel
      • 10.5.1 What is Enbrel and what is it Worth?
      • 10.5.2 Who are Enbrel's Competitors on the Therapeutic Protein Market?
      • 10.5.3 Enbrel will Grow with a CAGR of Almost 16% Between 2004 and 2010
    • 10.6 The Market for Copaxone
      • 10.6.1 What is Copaxone and What is it Worth?
      • 10.6.2 New Indications for Copaxone are in the Pipeline
      • 10.6.3 Who are Copaxone's Competitors on the Therapeutic Protein Market?
      • 10.6.4 Sanofi-Aventis Will Overtake Teva in Sales of Copaxone
  • 11. Forecast Summary for Therapeutic Proteins, to 2010
    • 11.1 Aranesp Will be the Market Leader in 2010
    • 11.2 The Market Leader Will Hold A Smaller Market Share in 2010 than in 2003
    • 11.3 Monoclonal Antibodies will Become the Leading Class of Therapeutic Protein
    • 11.4 Monoclonal Antibodies and Insulin will be the Fastest Growing Classes
    • 11.5 Blood Modifiers will Remain the Top Therapeutic Category
    • 11.6 Amgen will Remain the Market Leaders and Retain Their Market Share
    • 11.7 The Therapeutic Protein Market will Total Over $90bn by 2010
  • 12. Conclusion: The Market will Continue its Double-Digit Growth for the Foreseeable Future
  • Graphs
    • Graph 1.1 The Top 20 Therapeutic Proteins by Revenue ($m), 2003
    • Graph 3.1 Cost of Per Patient ($m) of the Top Ten Therapeutic Proteins, 2003
    • Graph 4.1 Revenues ($m) for Newcomers to the Therapeutic Protein Market, 2003-2004
    • Graph 4.2 Revenues ($m) for New Blockbusters on the Market, 2003
    • Graph 4.3 Revenues ($m) for Blockbuster Therapeutic Proteins, 2003
    • Graph 4.4 Global Procrit/Eprex Sales ($m), 2001-2004
    • Graph 4.5 Global Epogen Sales ($m), 2001-2004
    • Graph 4.6 Global Intron A Family Sales ($m), 2001-2004
    • Graph 4.7 Top Ten Winners and Losers in the Global Therapeutic Protein Market by Growth Rate (%), 2003
    • Graph 4.8 Global Aranesp Sales ($m), 2001-2004
    • Graph 4.9 Global Neulasta Sales ($m), 2002-2004
    • Graph 4.10 Global Enbrel Sales ($m), 2001-2004
    • Graph 4.11 Global Sales ($m) of Therapeutic Proteins by Class, 2003
    • Graph 4.12 Class Winners and Losers in the Therapeutic Protein Market by Growth Rate (%), 2003
    • Graph 4.13 Copaxone Sales ($m) by Company, 2001-2004
    • Graph 4.14 Market Shares (%) for Anti-Arthritic Therapeutic Proteins, 2003-2004
    • Graph 4.15 Winners and Losers in the Therapeutic Protein Market by Growth Rate (%), according to Therapeutic Category, 2003
    • Graph 4.16 Top Ten Companies in the Therapeutic Protein Market by Revenue ($m), 2003
    • Graph 4.17 Amgen's Annual R&D Expenditure ($m), 1993-2003
    • Graph 4.18 Company Winners and Losers in the Therapeutic Protein Market by Growth Rate (%), 2003
    • Graph 5.1 Forecast of Global Procrit/Eprex Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 5.2 Forecast of Global Epogen Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 5.3 Forecast of Global Aranesp Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 5.4 Forecast of Global NeoRecormon Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 5.5 Forecast of Global Epogin Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 5.6 Forecast of Global Espo Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 5.7 The Global Market ($m) for Erythropoietins, 2004 Versus 2010
    • Graph 5.8 The Global Market ($m) for Erythropoietins, 2010
    • Graph 5.9 CAGR (%) for the Global Erythropoietins Market, 2004-2010
    • Graph 5.10 Forecast for the Global Erythropoietins Market ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 6.1 Global Revenues ($m) for MAbs by Class, 2003
    • Graph 6.2 Global Revenues ($m) for MAbs by Indication, 2003
    • Graph 6.3 Global Sales ($m) of Remicade by Company, 2004-2010
    • Graph 6.4 Global Rituxan Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 6.5 Global Herceptin Sales ($m) by Company, 2004-2010
    • Graph 6.6 Global Humira Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 6.7 Global Zevalin Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 6.8 Global Bexxar Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 6.9 Global Avastin Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 6.10 Global Erbitux Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 6.11 Global Sales ($m) of Selected Monoclonal Antibodies, 2010
    • Graph 6.12 CAGRs (%) for Selected Monoclonal Antibodies, 2004-2010
    • Graph 6.13 Total Global Revenue ($bn) for the MAb Market, 2004-2010
    • Graph 7.1 Global Sales ($m) of the Intron A Family Versus Pegasys, 2004-2010
    • Graph 7.2 Global Intron A Family Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 7.3 Global Sales ($m) of Interferons for Multiple Sclerosis, 2004-2010
    • Graph 7.4 Best-Selling Interferons ($m), 2010
    • Graph 7.5 CAGRs (%) for the Best-Selling Interferons, 2004-2010
    • Graph 7.6 Total Global Revenues ($bn) for the Interferon Market, 2004-2010
    • Graph 8.1 Global Humulin and Humalog Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 8.2 Global Lantus Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 8.3 Global Levemir Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 8.4 Global Apidra Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 8.5 Global Exubera Sales ($m), 2005-2010
    • Graph 8.6 Global Insulin Sales ($m), 2010
    • Graph 8.7 CAGRs (%) for Insulins, 2004-2010
    • Graph 8.8 Total Global Revenues for the Insulin Market ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 9.1 The Global CSF Market ($m), 2004-2010
    • Graph 10.1 Global Revenues ($m) for Blood Factor Brands 2004 Versus 2010
    • Graph 10.2 The Global Blood Factor Market ($m), 2004 Versus 2010
    • Graph 10.3 Global Revenue ($m) for Therapeutic Vaccines, 2004 and 2010
    • Graph 10.4 Global Revenue ($m) for Growth Hormones, 2004 Versus 2010
    • Graph 10.5 The Global Enzyme Market ($m), 2004 vs. 2010
    • Graph 10.6 Global Enbrel Revenue ($m) by Company, 2004 vs. 2010
    • Graph 10.7 Global Sales ($m) for Copaxone Versus Competitor Therapeutic Proteins for MS, 2004-2010
    • Graph 11.1 Top Ten Therapeutic Proteins Globally by Revenue ($m), 2010
    • Graph 11.2 Revenue ($m) for Therapeutic Proteins by Class, 2010
    • Graph 11.3 CAGRs (%) for Classes of Therapeutic Protein, 2003-2010
    • Graph 11.4 Global Revenues ($m) for Therapeutic Proteins by Therapeutic Category, 2010
    • Graph 11.5 Top Ten Companies by Revenue ($m) in the Therapeutic Protein Market, 2010
    • Graph 12.1 Total Revenue ($m) for the Therapeutic Protein Market, 2003-2010
  • Tables
    • Table 1.1 Top 3 Classes, Therapeutic Categories and Indications for Therapeutic Proteins by Revenue, 2003
    • Table 2.1 Examples of Diseases that Therapeutic Proteins Treat
    • Table 3.1 Methods of Administration (MoA) for the Top Ten Therapeutic Proteins (2003)
    • Table 3.2 Features of the Top Ten Therapeutic Proteins (2003), Relevant to Cost
    • Table 3.3 Barriers to Overcome and Entry Strategies to Compete Successfully in the Biogenerics Market
    • Table 3.4 Manufacturing: Make or Buy?
    • Table 3.5 Drivers and Restraints of the Therapeutic Protein Market, 2005
    • Table 4.1 The Global Therapeutic Protein Market ($m), 2002-2003
    • Table 4.2 Top 20 Therapeutic Proteins by Revenue ($m), 2003
    • Table 4.3 Newcomers to the Global Therapeutic Protein Market, 2003
    • Table 4.4 Revenues ($m) for Blockbuster Therapeutic Proteins, 2003
    • Table 4.5 Revenue ($m) for Arthritis Medications in the Top 100, 2003
    • Table 4.6 Revenue ($m) for Classes of Therapeutic Protein, 2003
    • Table 4.7 Top Therapeutic Categories for Therapeutic Proteins by Revenue ($m), 2003
    • Table 4.8 Blood Modifying Therapeutic Proteins by Class and Revenue ($m), 2003
    • Table 4.9 Global Revenues ($m) for Multiple Sclerosis Therapeutic Proteins, 2003
    • Table 4.10 Global Revenues ($m) for Anti-Arthritic Therapeutic Proteins, 2003
    • Table 4.11 Revenues and Market Shares (%) for Anti-Arthritic Therapeutic Proteins, 2003-2004
    • Table 4.12 Revenues ($m) for Hormonal Treatments on the Therapeutic Proteins Market, 2003
    • Table 4.13 Amgen's Therapeutic Proteins by Global Revenues ($m), 2003
    • Table 4.14 Roche's Therapeutic Proteins by Global Revenues ($m), 2003
    • Table 4.15 Wyeth's Therapeutic Proteins by Global Revenues ($m), 2003
    • Table 5.1 Global Erythropoietin Revenue ($m), 2003
    • Table 5.2 The Erythropoietin Pipeline, 2005
    • Table 5.3 The Global Market ($m) for Erythropoietins, 2004-2010
    • Table 6.1 The Global MAb Market ($m), 2003
    • Table 6.2 Classes and Indications of MAbs on the Market, 2003
    • Table 6.3 Selected MAbs in Late-Stage Development, 2005
    • Table 6.4 Selected MAbs in Early-Stage Development, 2005
    • Table 6.5 Global Sales ($m) of Monoclonal Antibodies, 2004-2010
    • Table 7.1 Indications of Currently Marketed Interferons, 2005
    • Table 7.2 The Global Interferon Market ($m), 2003
    • Table 7.3 The Interferon Pipeline, 2005
    • Table 7.4 Global Interferon Revenues ($m), 2004-2010
    • Table 8.1 Insulin Treatments on the Top 400 Market, 2003
    • Table 8.2 Selected Products in the Insulin Pipeline, 2005
    • Table 8.3 Total Global Insulin Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Table 9.1 The Global CSF Market ($m), 2003
    • Table 9.2 The CSF Pipeline, 2005
    • Table 9.3 Value of the Global CSF Market ($m), 2004-2010
    • Table 10.1 The Global Blood Factors Market ($m), 2003
    • Table 10.2 The Blood Factor Pipeline, 2005
    • Table 10.3 Global Revenues ($m) for the Top-Selling Blood Factors, 2004 and 2010
    • Table 10.4 The Therapeutic Vaccine Pipeline, 2005
    • Table 10.5 Global Revenues ($m) for Therapeutic Vaccines 2004 Versus 2010
    • Table 10.6 The Global Market ($m) for Growth Hormones, 2003
    • Table 10.7 The Growth Hormone Pipeline, 2005
    • Table 10.8 Global Revenues ($m) for Growth Hormones, 2004 Versus 2010
    • Table 10.9 The Global Enzyme Market ($m), 2003
    • Table 10.10 The Enzyme Pipeline, 2005
    • Table 10.11 Global Revenue ($m) for Enzymes, 2004 vs. 2010
    • Table 10.12 Positions for Anti-Arthritic Therapeutic Proteins, 2003 and 2009
    • Table 10.13 Global Copaxone Sales ($m), 2004-2010
    • Table 11.1 Top Ten Therapeutic Proteins Globally by Revenue ($m), Including Co- Marketing Splits, 2010
    • Table 11.2 Top Ten Therapeutic Proteins Globally by Revenue ($m), Excluding Co-Marketing Splits, 2010
    • Table 11.3 Revenue ($m) for Therapeutic Proteins by Class, 2010
    • Table 11.4 CAGRs (%) for Classes of Therapeutic Protein, 2003-2010
    • Table 11.5 Global Revenues ($m) for Therapeutic Proteins by Therapeutic Category, 2010
    • Table 11.6 Top Ten Companies in the Therapeutic Protein Market Globally by Revenue ($m), 2010
    • Table 11.7 The Global Therapeutic Proteins Market ($m), 2010
    • Table 12.1 Therapeutic Proteins in the Pipeline with Non-Parenteral Methods of Delivery, 2005
  • Figures
    • Figure 4.1 The Market Share (%) for All Blockbuster Therapeutic Proteins, 2003
    • Figure 4.2 Global Market Shares (%) for the Top-Selling Therapeutic Proteins, 2003
    • Figure 4.3 Global Market Shares (%) for Therapeutic Proteins by Class, 2003
    • Figure 4.4 Market Shares (%) in the Global Therapeutic Protein Market by Company, 2003
    • Figure 5.1 The Erythropoietin Feedback Loop
    • Figure 6.1 Protocol for the Production of Monoclonal Antibodies (Anti-Snake Venom)
    • Figure 6.2 Global Market Shares (%) for MAb Classes, 2003
    • Figure 6.3 Global Market Shares (%) for MAbs by Indication, 2003
    • Figure 11.1 Global Market Shares (%) for the Top Ten Therapeutic Proteins, 2010
    • Figure 11.2 Global Market Shares (%) for Classes of Therapeutic Protein, 2010
    • Figure 11.3 Global Market Shares (%) for Categories of Therapeutic Protein, 2010
    • Figure 11.4 Global Market Shares (%) for the Top Ten Companies in the Therapeutic Protein Market, 2010