Home | Publications | Sales & Marketing | Branding place holder
place holder place holder

Branding


Influencing Brand Preferences in the Flow Cytometry Market


Publication Date   July 2006
Publisher   BioInformatics
Product Type   Strategic Report
Pages   169
ISBN Number   not applicable
Product Code   BFC041
Ask a question about this product?

Price £2,680.00

approximately: $5,377 | €3,364

Summary


Note: Please be aware that the PDF price includes a Enterprise-Wide Electronic License and one print copy.

Although flow cytometry has enabled scientists to analyze a variety of cell types since the late 1970's, today's technology applications, from cell sorting to apoptosis, are even more broad reaching and powerful in the life science research market.

Through optical means, flow cytometers distinguish cells on the basis of size and shape and on the basis of identifier molecules inside and on the surface of cells. Nearly all scientists appreciate that flow cytometry provides a lot of information about one's sample in a relatively short period of time.

However, scientists are at various levels of sophistication and have differing experimental needs when it comes to this versatile technology. Some think of flow cytometry as a "black box," while others can easily operate the most sophisticated of cytometers. Given these differences in customer needs and scientific knowledge, how can suppliers best secure and expand their market share?

To address this important question, BioInformatics LLC surveyed 750 life scientists about the types of flow cytometry reagents and flow cytometers that they use and their opinions regarding suppliers in this market. The sophisticated set of analyses in this study go beyond previous reports on this market to reveal essential strategic insights about customer brand, equipment, and reagent preferences regarding flow cytometry products.

Respondents recognized brand reputation among the most important influences in their purchasing decision when choosing a supplier for instruments and reagents.

While scientists identified certain suppliers as their "primary brands," they usually rely on several brands in this high growth market. Instrument preference across brands varied by the application and customer type. Looking forward, 40% of respondents believed that the number of tubes analyzed per week will increase over the next 12 months, with specific segments of scientists forecasting double digit increases in throughput volume this coming year.

Despite the presence of several dominant players, the market remains competitive, with no one supplier or brand yet capturing end-to-end customers for the full spectrum of needs and applications of flow cytometry. As indicated by customer segmentation analyses by market, by geography, and by research needs, very different product preferences exist among subsets of consumers, especially core labs.

Suppliers of flow cytometry instruments and/or reagents analyzed include:

  • BD Biosciences Immunocytometry Systems
  • BD Biosciences Pharmingen
  • Beckman Coulter
  • BioDETECT
  • BioSource (Invitrogen)
  • Calbiochem (EMD Biosciences)
  • Caltag (Invitrogen)
  • Cambrex
  • Cell Signaling Technology
  • Chemicon International
  • Cytopeia
  • Dako
  • eBioscience
  • Guava Technologies
  • Jackson ImmunoResearch

Laboratories

  • Luminex Miltenyi Biotec
  • Molecular Probes (Invitrogen)
  • Partec
  • Quantum Dot (Invitrogen)
  • R&D Systems
  • Santa Cruz Biotechnology
  • Serotec (MorphoSys)
  • Sigma-Aldrich
  • Southern Biotech
  • Takara Bio
  • Upstate
  • US Biological
  • Zymed (Invitrogen)

Content


  • Section 1. Analysis and Interpretation of Survey Results
    • Executive Overview
    • Study Objectives
    • Flow Cytometry Application Frequency and Extent Employed
    • Application Frequency by Market Segment and by Geographic Region
    • Flow Cytometer Brand Preferences
    • Flow Cytometer Market Share Estimations
    • Factors Influencing Use of Instrument Brand
    • Flow Cytometer Customer Loyalty
    • Customer Satisfaction with Instrumentation Parameters by Supplier
    • Flow Cytometer Brand Equity Supplier Comparison
    • Price-Performance Relationship and Perceived Value
    • Flow Cytometry Reagent Brand Preferences
    • Flow Cytometry Reagent Brand Differentiation
    • Reagent Market Share Estimation
    • Reagent Market Growth Potential
    • Reagent Purchasing Influences
    • Reagent Customer Loyalty
    • Conclusion
  • Section 2. Study Methodology and Demographics
    • Methodology
    • Definition of Terms
    • Demographics
    • Questionnaire
  • Section 3. Presentation of Survey Data
    • Flow Cytometry Usage
    • Applications Regularly Used by Scientists
    • Percent of Flow Cytometry Use by Technique
    • Flow Cytometry Reagents
    • Reagent Suppliers Used and Indicated Primary Suppliers
    • Factors Influencing Decision to Use Flow Cytometry Reagents
    • Degree of Influence Product Attributes Exert in Purchase of Reagents
    • Likelihood of Recommending Flow Cytometry Brand Used
    • Brand Comparisons
    • Degree of Similarity/Difference Between Reagent Brands
    • Throughput and Experimental Parameters
    • Tubes Analyzed/Sorted by Flow Cytometry per Week on Average
    • Suppliers of Flow Cytometers
    • Flow Cytometer Suppliers Used with Percentage Use Breakouts
    • Expected Change in Usage
    • Factors Influencing Instrument Use
    • Degree of Influence Product Attributes Exert in Purchase of Instruments
    • Critical Advantages Offered by Flow Cytometer Brand
    • Degree of Similarity/Difference Between Instrument Brands
    • Familiarity with Flow Cytometer Capabilities of Each Brand
    • Evaluating Flow Cytometers
    • Flow Cytometer Models Used by Product and Brand
    • Performance Ratings of Each Flow Cytometer Product
  • Section 4. Appendices
    • Qualitative Insights and Perspectives
    • Cross-Tabulations of Survey Data
    • Other Recent Publications
    • About BioInformatics
    • Our Valued Clients