 |
 |
 |
Management / Strategy |
|
|
Pricing & Reimbursement in Europe
Can the drive for cost effectiveness overcome cost containment?
Publication Date October 2006
Publisher Datamonitor
Product Type Report
Pages 214
ISBN Number not applicable
Product Code DAT561
|
|
|
Summary
Introduction
Combined drug sales in the five major European markets represent the second-biggest market globally after the US. Unlike the US, which is dominated by a wide range of private payers, governments are the major payers in Europe. The monopsonistic nature of these markets provides governments with significant leverage and they use extensive P&R controls to contain spiralling healthcare costs.
Scope
- Evaluation of the pressures facing the drugs industry and how these pressures will impact P&R
- Overview of global P&R controls, examining which are important in the European market both currently and in the future
- In-depth analysis of each of the five major European markets, examining both the healthcare systems and the key P&R infrastructure
- Identification of trends and recommendations shaping the European P&R environment
Highlights
Better dialogue between healthcare providers and drugs companies is vital; however, healthcare provider devolution has led to fragmentation of the key European markets, making it difficult to identify key P&R stakeholders
Many European governments profess to be willing to reward innovative drugs, however this is largely a smokescreen as debt-ridden governmental payers increasingly prioritize cost containment
European drug developers need to prioritize P&R as an important factor in drug development, and focus on securing strong P&R justification before green-lighting me-too drugs
Reasons to Purchase
- Gain a clear understanding of the healthcare market dynamics and P&R environment within each of the five major European healthcare markets
- Review P&R trends in Europe, based on our analysis and primary research conducted with key stakeholders in the industry
- Gain insight into how P&R fits into company strategy and understand how specific P&R trends are shaping the European markets
|
Content
- Chapter 1 Executive Summary
- Scope of the report
- Key findings
- Chapter 2 Overview Of The Drugs Market: Identifying Why Pricing And Reimbursement Is Important And Where It Fits In
- Introduction: why is drug pricing and reimbursement important?
- Pharma is facing a reduction in productivity
- R&D spend is rising
- The number of approvals is falling
- There are delays in P&R assessment
- Biotech is more productive and is set to have a correspondingly higher growth rate
- Blockbuster patent expiries are also damaging Big Pharma
- Pharma pipeline strategy needs to adjust to market demands
- Globally, public and private payers exert pressure on profit margins
- Pressures on drug developers rise because healthcare expenditure is set to continue to increase
- Although drugs make up a relatively small percentage of healthcare spending, they are a highly visible target
- Spending on drugs is set to rise
- The drugs industry is being squeezed on drug pricing and reimbursement
- Chapter 3 Global Overview Of P&r Tool Implementation
- Introduction
- Price setting mechanisms are used to set the initial theoretical price
- The initial theoretical price is then modulated by a range of factors
- A key factor impacting pricing is the broad range of pricing controls used globally
- An overview of government-led price controls
- Profit controls are used in some European countries such as the UK
- Reference pricing is used extensively across Europe
- Price cutting and price freezing play a central role in European cost containment
- Linking pricing with the Consumer Price Index
- The use of pharmacoeconomics in pricing controls: using healthcare economics, outcomes research and pharmacoeconomics to justify pricing
- Discounts and rebates play a role in European drug pricing
- A single European drug price has been discussed as a possible cost containment tool
- A range of factors impact the drug price only once the drug has been launched
- Parallel importation can reduce profit margins for drugs companies
- Health informatics may lead to increased cost containment
- DTC marketing cannot be used in Europe to support higher drug pricing
- Generic incursion reduces profit margins for drugs
- Key global reimbursement mechanisms
- Reimbursement favours innovation-focused drug development
- Spending on sales and marketing is prioritized over seeking innovation
- The focus on sales and marketing encourages the development of me-too drugs, although healthcare providers are penalizing me-too development
- A wide range of factors influence reimbursement
- Controlling doctors' budgets is used more widely in Europe than in the US
- Volume and expenditure limitations play a role in Europe
- Although tiered co-pay and formularies play an extensive role in the US, they are not used in Europe, and most patients pay a low co-pay in a flat-fee form
- Formulary access and Positive/Negative lists play a more significant role in the US compared to Europe
- Taxes on reimbursed drugs
- Some countries require drugs to be included on reimbursement lists of a number of countries before reimbursement is granted
- Pharmacoeconomics and risk-sharing agreements are increasingly important in Europe
- Step therapy or fail first plays a key role in the US, but is not widely used explicitly in Europe
- Prior authorization
- Pharmacist substitution
- Enforcing a switch to OTC status is another reimbursement restriction tool in both the US and some European countries
- Chapter 4 Pricing & Reimbursement In France
- Healthcare in France: high debts increase the focus on P&R
- An overview of the French healthcare system
- Private healthcare is increasingly used to support public healthcare
- French healthcare provision can be split into PCP-dominated community healthcare and hospital-based healthcare
- The creation of the HAS has significant impacts on healthcare provision in Europe
- A range of other stakeholders impacts on healthcare provision
- Recent changes affecting the pricing and reimbursement environment in France
- The Transparency Commission determines the SMR and the ASMR
- The SMR and the ASMR are used as a basis for P&R in France
- The unification of a range of P&R functionalities under HAS is set to transform P&R in France
- P&R mechanisms used to contain costs in France
- A range of reforms have been instituted to boost cost containment
- Recent co-payment reforms help drive healthcare cost containment
- The 'Mdecin Traitant' scheme drives adoption of a gatekeeper system in France
- There has been considerable consolidation across a range of healthcare stakeholders to help contain costs
- A range of P&R tools are being used to support healthcare reforms in the fight to contain costs
- Volume limitations are an important restrictor of strong sales growth
- The focus on utilizing and incorporating reference pricing is increasing
- The market profile of drugs companies and their products is limited by restricting salesforce activity and physician contact
- Taxes and levies make the environment harsher for drug developers
- Generic usage and prescription is the most important macroeconomic factor modulating pricing once the drug is on the market
- Chapter 5 Pricing & Reimbursement In Germany
- Healthcare in Germany: the need for cost containment
- An overview of the German healthcare system
- Public healthcare insurance covers the vast majority of German patients
- Ambulatory care is highly regulated and is dominated by reimbursement controls
- A range of stakeholders impact healthcare provision in Germany
- The limited control that governmental bodies exert on healthcare provision is primarily mediated through the Federal Ministry of Health and the 16 Lnder
- Sickness funds are the key healthcare provider
- Physician and pharmacist committees exert significant influence on prescription
- A range of organizations represent industry interests
- A number of reforms shape the evolution of the German healthcare market
- IQWiG is helping to introduce cost effectiveness and evidence-based healthcare
- Recent changes affecting the pricing and reimbursement environment in Germany
- Reference pricing is a key cost-containment tool but the inclusion of patented drugs in the scheme is highly contentious
- The evolution of jumbo reference pricing
- Reference price levels are calculated by the Federal Committee of Physicians and Sickness Funds
- German pharmaceutical companies are fighting jumbo reference pricing
- Jumbo reference pricing is affecting an increasing number of drugs
- The requirement for innovation is steep and many drugs are not sufficiently innovative
- Pharmacy substitution: a cost-saving idea in principle but it has yet to show significant savings
- Restrictors of aut idem substitution
- Incentives for aut idem substitution
- The impact of aut idem substitution on the German drugs market
- Pharmacy and pharmaceutical company rebates are used in cost containment
- The high number of patients exempt from co-payment is being reduced
- Historically, budgets and spending caps have restricted Germany's pharmaceutical market
- Ambulatory physician budgets have been successful at reining in drug expenditure
- Hospital budgets are being reshaped by DRGs
- Despite several initiatives over the last 15 years, there are no plans to introduce a positive list
- Germany lacks a positive list
- Payers are restricting the number of reimbursable drugs by placing them on negative lists in Germany
- Additional factors impact on drug prescription guidelines
- Discounts and rebates increasingly shape profit margins in the German hospital markets
- Parallel importation and generic competition impact on drug price following launch
- A reduction in the parallel importation quota is set to reduce the damage to pharmaceutical company profit margins
- Generic penetration in Germany is relatively high
- Healthcare informatics is playing an increasingly important role in German healthcare provision
- Chapter 6 Pricing & Reimbursement In Italy
- The Italian healthcare system is racked by debt and it is very difficult for drugs companies to generate a profit in this market
- An overview of the Italian healthcare system
- Private healthcare is used to replace public service with better provision
- Italian healthcare provision is increasingly decentralized
- The Italian national health service
- Reimbursement is still assessed on a national level
- AIFA dictates drug reimbursement in Italy
- Although there is a formalized reimbursement structure, reimbursement is based on negotiations
- Drugs are grouped into classes to determine reimbursement levels
- Class C drugs still face cost containment pressures
- Healthcare delivery is the responsibility of regional and local healthcare bodies
- ASLs provide primary and secondary care in Italy
- Italian reforms have shaped healthcare provision significantly in the last two decades
- Recent changes affecting the pricing and reimbursement environment in Italy
- Patient co-payment is making a re-emergence on a local level
- Drugs companies help fund the Italian healthcare system through levies
- Price cuts are part of price manipulation, and are used to contain costs in Italy
- Pharmacist substitution has been introduced but has historically had slow adoption
- Reference pricing is a key cost-containment tool in Italy
- Drug monitoring and risk-sharing agreements have been introduced in Italy
- Parallel importation and generic competition impact on drug price following launch
- Generic drugs have historically made a limited impact but are now being increasingly utilized
- Chapter 7 Pricing & Reimbursement In Spain
- An overview of the Spanish healthcare system
- Spanish healthcare has become increasingly devolved to the Autonomous Communities
- Public healthcare dominates healthcare provision
- Inpatient and outpatient healthcare is provided on a devolved regional basis
- The introduction of the Medicines Bill in July 2006 revolutionizes healthcare provision in Spain
- Recent changes affecting the pricing and reimbursement environment in Spain
- Reference pricing, price cuts, price freezes, discounts, rebates and taxes are all used in Spain to limit drug company profit margins
- Reference pricing has evolved significantly with the introduction of the new medicines bill
- Price cuts and price freezes are used in Spain to contain costs
- Despite their unpopularity, discounts, rebates and taxes are used by the Spanish government
- Positive/negative lists and prior authorization are used to limit physician prescription
- Positive/negative lists have met with limited success in Spain
- Despite issues raised by the EC, prior authorization exists in Spain
- Additional tools are used in cost containment, including pharmacist substitution and patient co-payment, although these have a limited role in P&R in Spain
- Pharmacist substitution is allowed on a relatively restricted basis
- Patient co-payment is low in Spain
- Generic competition is having an increasing role affecting drug prices following launch
- The profile of generics is being raised
- A range of strategies have been used by Big Pharma to restrict parallel importation of drugs out of Spain
- Healthcare informatics helps to promote the rational use of medicines
- Chapter 8 Pricing & Reimbursement In The Uk
- An overview of the UK healthcare system
- Governmental spending on healthcare in the UK has risen significantly in the last five years
- A range of trusts, authorities and NHS plans increase the complexity of healthcare provision in the UK
- A range of trusts and authorities are involved in healthcare provision in the NHS
- PCTs dominate healthcare provision in the UK
- PCTs and SHAs shape prescription in the primary care setting and beyond
- A number of plans and publications are shaping the evolution of the NHS
- Additional initiatives impact on NHS evolution
- A range of schemes and bodies impact on drug prescription in the UK
- NICE is a key P&R stakeholder in the UK
- NICE and HTAs
- HTA bodies are becoming more homogeneous, however significant differences still exist between them
- The government has thrown significant power behind the adoption of NICE recommendations
- The postguidance and preguidance effects are a significant concern
- Accelerated assessments via the STA route will help to reduce the preguidance effect, although there are also concerns over how the shortened timeframe will impact assessment and approval
- There are concerns that NICE and more specifically the new STAs are shaped by politics
- A range of schemes also impact on drug prescription
- Recent changes affecting the pricing and reimbursement environment in the UK
- Direct pricing and reimbursement mechanisms in the UK
- The PPRS is the principal method of governmental P&R regulation in the UK
- Patient co-pay, hospital discounts and pharmacist clawback are also used to contain costs, however they are not key P&R tools
- Parallel importation and generic competition impact on drug price following launch in the UK
- The UK has a strong generics market and increased switching to generics is set to make it stronger
- Parallel importation
- Chapter 9 Key P&r Trends And Recommendations Across The Five Major European Countries
- European P&R is a difficult environment to generate a strong ROI
- There is slow uptake of new drugs in the European market
- Governments need to clarify their P&R strategy, making it more transparent and remove conflicting policies
- Governments are incentivizing increased generic prescription and setting quotas for parallel trade
- The drugs industry is being pressed into helping to fund healthcare provision
- Identifying and targeting the right stakeholders is increasingly difficult in the various European markets
- The mix of P&R tools used by governments depends on other European countries and constantly fluctuates
- The regulator and the P&R bodies have different goals
- The definition of innovation is making the European P&R environment difficult
- Innovation is the key to securing strong pricing and reimbursement, however, is it being adequately rewarded?
- Do governments recognize the argument of incremental innovation?
- How to best identify innovation? It is based on whether a drug improves quality and/or quantity of life
- Me-too drugs, together with non-essential drugs are being strongly discriminated against from a reimbursement perspective
- What will happen if innovation is marginalized?
- The use of PE in Europe is evolving
- The use of PE in Europe is increasing
- The way that PE analysis is being used and analyzed is evolving
- Drugs companies need to determine which bodies want which types of analysis
- Payer HTAs are increasingly based on in-house analysis using company clinical data and peer-reviewed PE analysis
- P&R bodies want simpler PE models, although not at the expense of a confused message
- There is increased sharing of information between the main HTA bodies
- Key recommendations: ways that drugs companies can build up skills to optimize European P&R strategy
- Negotiation skills are highly important
- Drugs companies need to be better at communicating
- Internal communication is vital in ensuring a strong ROI
- External communication is vital in ensuring a strong price and adequate reimbursement
- It is vital for drugs companies to have a clear P&R strategy
- It is important to integrate P&R analysis into the clinical trial process
- The remit of PE analysis should be broadened and shifted into earlier-phase clinical trials
- Drugs companies should know which markets to launch in first
- Drugs companies should consider adopting certain US-focused P&R strategies
- Consider using political lobbying and legislation to change the P&R environment
- Carry out more effective targeting of healthcare professionals as part of the allowance for providing information
- Chapter 10 Glossary
- Chapter 11 Bibliography
- Publications and online articles
- Datamonitor resources
- Conference literature
- Online resources
- List of Tables
- Table 1: HAS has taken over a number of healthcare P&R stakeholders
- Table 2: Examples of additional stakeholders that affect healthcare provision and P&R in France
- Table 3: The range of ASMR levels used to determine reimbursement in France
- Table 4: Key reforms shaping the German healthcare system
- Table 5: Key drug reforms in Italy, 1993-2005
- Table 6: Examples of discounts on drug prices for high-volume drugs (statins, PPIs), 2003-05
- Table 7: Trusts and authorities involved in UK healthcare provision
- Table 8: Key plans and publications shaping NHS evolution
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: Key pressures facing drugs developers in the US market, 2006
- Figure 2: Key P&R cost-containment tools in EU5
- Figure 3: NME & BLA approvals, compared to PhRMA company R&D spend, 1990-2004
- Figure 4: Average time delay between marketing authorization and effective market access, using products from June 2000- June 2004
- Figure 5: Biotechnology companies are set to show a stronger CAGR than pharmaceutical companies for 2004-10
- Figure 6: The percentage of BLAs approved is falling, while the percentage of NMEs is rising, 1990-2004
- Figure 7: Generic risk facing leading pharmaceutical and biotech companies is rising through to 2010
- Figure 8: Average EU5 healthcare spending has risen steadily between 1990 and 2003
- Figure 9: Spending on pharmaceuticals as a percentage of total healthcare spending is higher in the EU5 than the US, although some European markets have lower spending than Japan
- Figure 10: The UK has the highest CAGR increase in healthcare spending for 1990-2003
- Figure 11: Factors affecting drug pricing, 2006
- Figure 12: Key pricing controls used globally, 2006
- Figure 13: Globally, a number of factors can affect the price of a drug following launch
- Figure 14: Examples of reimbursement controls used globally, 2006
- Figure 15: Estimated cost-containment savings in France, 2003-05
- Figure 16: Reimbursable drugs provided by retail pharmacies account for three-quarters of drug provision, 2003
- Figure 17: Both the SMR and the ASMR rating are required to determine the reimbursement rate
- Figure 18: Key cost-containment P&R tools used in Germany
- Figure 19: Estimated cost-containment savings in Germany, 2003-05
- Figure 20: There are few major differences between public and private healthcare insurance in Germany
- Figure 21: A number of governmental bodies, physician and pharmacist associations, and industry associations impact healthcare provision in Germany
- Figure 22: Pfizer's evaluation of Sortis' therapeutic benefit did not match the assessment of the drug
- Figure 23: Pfizer's atorvastatin sales in Germany fell significantly after being removed from the reference pricing list
- Figure 24: AstraZeneca's Nexium generates strong sales and volume growth, after drug prices fall to the reference level
- Figure 25: Parallel importation penetration in Germany increased from 1997-2002 before falling slightly through to 2004
- Figure 26: Key cost-containment P&R tools used in Italy
- Figure 27: Estimated cost-containment savings in Italy, 2003-05
- Figure 28: The Italian healthcare system is highly decentralized
- Figure 29: AIFA acts as an umbrella to a range of commissions and observatories
- Figure 30: Reimbursement depends on the level of therapeutic advantage offered by a new drug
- Figure 31: Key cost-containment P&R tools used in Spain, 2006
- Figure 32: Estimated cost-containment savings in Spain, 2003-05
- Figure 33: Spain's healthcare provision is largely decentralized with provision made by ACs
- Figure 34: There are a range of incentives and disincentives impacting generic prescription in Spain
- Figure 35: An overview of the UK healthcare system
- Figure 36: A range of bodies impact drug prescription in the UK
- Figure 37: There are more advantages than disadvantages to the PPRS system
- Figure 38: There are a number of incentives for generic prescription in the UK
- Figure 39: Drugs companies must overcome a range of hurdles to generate a strong ROI
- Figure 40: European markets are complex and involve a number of bodies, complicating the task of identifying key P&R stakeholders
- Figure 41: The battle between cost-containment and cost-effectiveness determines whether drugs companies stay in the European market or decide to exit
- Figure 42: Although a greater priority is being placed on PE analysis, it has a relatively low profile in Germany and France
- Figure 43: The optimal launch across Europe takes place over three waves
- Figure 44: Estimated cost-containment savings in the five major European markets, 2003-05
|
|
| Scope |
Expert Insight/Opinion |
|
| Level |
Specific High-level Advice |
|
| Features |
Primary Research Data |
|
|